First, I should mention, for anyone following along, that my posts here will be sporadic. I might post several times in a week, or I might go a month without posting. Welcome to my unpredictable life.
One of the trickiest things about a child who is not verbal, but who is also not small any more, is that they can get into things. And get out of things. As they get bigger and smarter, the childproofing aisle of your local big box store becomes inadequate. Flimsy plastic tabs are great for toddlers, but can’t always hold up to big kids. And if you have a wanderer, it’s even more critical to find solutions.
I thought I’d cover a couple of things we’ve come up with in our house to keep our daughter out of trouble.
First, the fridge. Our little girl loves ketchup. Loves it. Also, barbecue sauce. And ranch dressing. Anyway, the way she expresses her love is to open the bottle and squeeze it onto the table, the floor, herself, and anything else she can find, and then dips her hand in it and licks it. It’s just the slightest bit messy.
Since we can’t maintain eyes on her at every moment of every day, and since she’s not one to miss a good ketchup opportunity, we had to find a ketchup containment solution.
[Side note: ketchup packets are a good solution for that specific problem. The more general problem of helping herself to any and all messy liquids and sauces is actually what we’re tackling here.]
So, short of not keeping anything messy in the refrigerator, the best solution we could come up with was a way to secure the fridge somehow. We used the childproof slide-in latches for a little while, but she’s too strong for them now. So after a trip to the hardware store, here’s what I came up with:
The key for this lock is on a string, tucked into the old plastic latch from the previous childproof lock. I just screwed it right into the fridge itself, and it’s held up well.
Easy enough to unlock:
Now I should mention that we do not keep this locked at all times. We lock it only if there’s something she really wants to make a mess with in there, and we’re not able to keep an eye on her. It’s too much of a pain to have to get the key out every time you want to open the fridge. But at least we have the ability to lock it when the need arises.
Also, one of our daughter’s care providers is actually a manager for social services in a neighboring county. We ask her about policies and regulations from time to time, and she told us that from a social services perspective, leaving it locked all the time would be a problem. Something about preventing a child from having access to food — you know how goofy rules and regulations can be for things like this. I imagine if you needed to keep it locked, that’s mostly your business, but I wanted to mention anyway.
So, a trip to the hardware store, a price tag of under $10, and under 10 minutes to install, and it’s held up and worked well for us. I hope somebody else out there finds this helpful as well.
—


Words are tricky things. A cage is what you put an animal in. We don’t cage people. That’s Not Okay.
You may have heard the news about a child with severe autism being kept in a cage. For the vast majority of people, the first and only reaction is visceral, emotional, and instant. This is Not Okay. That was my reaction too. But as the parent of a child with severe autism, it also got me thinking.
If you read the article, you’ll learn that the child, and the family’s other children, all appeared to be healthy and did not show signs of neglect. Neighbors reported seeing all of the children regularly, and often looking happy. The report also says that the confinement was “possibly to control his violent outbursts”. The “cage” would be more accurately described as a “dog run.” Reportedly about five by three feet, with six foot high walls, no top, and a bed inside.
I can’t really imagine getting to the point where you think this is a good solution, but sometimes the problems are hard, and the solutions are not obvious. It got me thinking about alternatives. And it got me thinking about what’s acceptable.
Where are the boundaries between what’s okay and what’s not? And what constitutes a cage?
If you have a non-verbal wanderer with no sense of danger, is it okay to let them go in a fenced back yard with locked gates?

What about an enclosed patio with locks? Is it okay to put a hook-and-eye latch on the outside of his bedroom door?

Is it okay to turn the doorknob around so you can lock the door from the outside?

Is it acceptable to use one of these?

Is this okay because it has netting instead of metal, even though it’s smaller than what was described?
If that’s not strong enough, is it acceptable to use one of these instead?
What if your insurance pays for it? Is it okay then, even though it looks an awful lot like a cage?
Where is the line?
At what point does it become a “cage”? At what point do we say, yes, this is okay, but no, this is going too far? At what point are the parents “bad parents” who we are free to judge, whether we know the whole story or not?
Maybe all enclosures are bad. Maybe they should be able to roam free. (Even if they’re potentially a danger to themselves or others?)
Or maybe it’s not about the enclosed space, but how it is used. Maybe a child can be abused and neglected in a typical bedroom without any locks on the doors at all. Maybe a child can be treated in a loving, positive, caring way, even if they have a bed like those linked above. Not so sure about the dog run. But then that’s the whole question isn’t it?
When one side of the line is acceptable and the other elicits a strong, visceral reaction and lots of judgment, we should probably come to agreement on precisely where we’re drawing that line.
I’m not asking these questions rhetorically. I really want to know, because, among other things, I don’t ever want to end up on the evening news. I don’t think we’re anywhere near the line, but since I don’t know where it is, what if I’m wrong?